3 search hits
-
Cultural variables and their impact on the furniture design process in the era of globalization
(2015)
-
Ahmed Mohammed M. Abdelrazik
- It is known that humans are to very large degree products of their environment; their thoughts, desires and needs are shaped by many cultural trends related to their societies, creeds and traditions, which are different according to changes in natural and environmental factors.
These cultural variables depend on many issues, which differ from one place to another and from one country to another depending on environmental systems, history, language, religion, beliefs and so on. Accordingly, we can find huge differences in the cultures of people and their needs.
Although designers are always keen on maintaining a certain aloofness, a certain freedom of mind, they too are subject to the cultural trends affecting their respective societies, the impacts of which will appear in their work. Designers’ thoughts and works will need to be analyzed in order to appreciate positive or negative effects, with special consideration given to current developments, especially the ongoing shrinking of the world into one “global village” under the globalization era.
In many developing countries there is confusion among designers, in addition to the clear gap and the conflict between the meaning of globalization and the concept of “cultural identity” and its applications in the field of creativity. All this needs to be clarified and investigated.
Therefore, the main objective of this thesis is to study and analyze this tangled relationship, and to make an attempt to apply an integrated vision to connect cultural concepts as variables and investigate their influence on design under the conditions of a comprehensive and widespread globalization.
-
For User Study : the Implications of Design
(2006)
-
Rosan W.Y. Chow
- The practice of user study is well presented at numerous conferences, documented in various literatures and discussed at different Internet discussion groups. At the moment, there seems to be plenty of experiences and knowledge about user study accumulated in design practice. The idea of user study is well received and affirmed across professional and educational institutions. It is generally accepted that user study is important for contemporary professional practice of Industrial Design. However, our belief is mostly supported by informal observation, testimony and good will but lacks formal articulation. The profession of communication design lags behind other design fields in terms of practicing user study. Rigorous discourse on user study in Industrial Design lags behind that in Human Computer Interaction. Moreover, other fields have already recognized the need for more in-depth understanding on user study so research on user study has begun. These studies, however, are missing a perspective from design. The lack of formal articulation and design perspective has left the ‘applicability gap’ open between user study and design. Although we know that user study results are not necessarily useful for design practice, we have not dealt with this issue properly. This study is aimed to address this problem. Research on user study has been empirical: observing how designers design. However, this type of research often lacks theoretical framework, and as a result, we are not certain if the research outcome is by chance or systemic. More importantly, this type of research slights historical and cultural contingency, and it begs the question whether it can serve as principle for future practice and research that for sure will change. User study is an invention to suit design practice. But design practice is also an invention. We do not have to describe and explain design practice as now but to interpret and articulate the potential/possibility of user study based on an articulation of the nature of design – to create an idealized scenario. I seek to articulate the nature of design and draw implications for these two questions: “How does user study inform design?” and “What are the formal characteristics of user study outcome?” This theoretical inquiry provides a language by which the practice and research of user study can be reexamined and reorganized. The result will bring issues to the public domain for debate and improvement. It will increase the effectiveness of our communication to one another and will serve a (temporary) map for guiding research and design on user study. In the first part of the investigation, we explore the nature of design and arrive at a workable definition that design is an inquiry oriented toward a specification that fits. In the second part, we derive meanings from this articulation to address the research questions, and it leads to some unexpected conclusions. For the research question, “How does user study inform design?”, based on the nature of design articulated, it is implied that current user study provides a context for design. For the question, “What are the formal characteristics of user study outcome?”, it is concluded that the context ought to be a specific reasonable narrative rather than a general casual explanation. More interestingly, the results of the inquiry make us realize that context creation does not necessarily precede the generation of possible specifications in the design process, thus it calls into question the fundamental assumption on which the research questions are based. It is revealed that not only user study informs design, but also in principle, design can drive user study. Not only is design-driven user study possible, but it is also preferable for design situations where the product to be made is highly undetermined. The conclusions project new perspectives on jumping the ‘applicability gap’, open up new line of inquiries for user study, and shed light on the potential coordination between design and research in general.
-
Action Theory and Cognitive Psychology in Industrial Design : User Models and User Interfaces
(1999)
-
Leshan Li
- The goal of this dissertation is to develop a systematic human-centered design philosophy "Human-Artifact-as-an-Entity" or "form follows use" and human-centered design approaches based on ecological views. It applies at the first time systematically action theory and cognitive psychology in industrial design. It creates the new human-centered user models, called irrational user models, which include in the narrow sense the mental model (perception, cognition, motor performance, emotion, and volition) and the action model (the course of action). The irrational user models involve the rational aspect, the irrational aspect and the unusual aspect, for example, way of action in emergency, and these models include in the wide sense values, needs, self-consciousness, and cultural environments. It develops the instrumental needs, as a complement to Maslow´s needs theory. It defines the action system. It classifies and defines five kinds of user actions: perceptual action, cognitive action, expressive action, volitional action, and skilled action. It gives systematically the definition of user-artifact interface and its design theory. It defines information and the structure of information for industrial design. The main tasks of designers are to provide action guidance for users, including goal-guidance, preparation-guidance, plan-guidance, selection-guidance, execution-guidance, rule-guidance, termination-guidance, cognition-guidance, and evaluation-guidance. It suggests the criteria of the natural way of user´s action to artifacts. This dissertation involves four chapters: (1) Motivation and action components, (2) action control, (3) action system, (4) case studies.